Erdoğan-Biden meeting
The Turkish president’s meeting with his U.S. counterpart in Brussels too was extremely important. After all, Biden did not hold bilateral meetings with any leader at the Belgian capital – with the notable exception of Erdoğan. On a separate note, Bloomberg’s editorial, which claimed that Turkey had abandoned the West long ago and called on Biden to sever ties with Ankara at the NATO Summit, was utter nonsense. On the contrary, the two leaders’ body language and statements at the summit signaled that the engagement was quite positive. Indeed, the U.S. president told reporters that he had a “very good” talk with Erdoğan after their 45-minute tete-a-tete meeting.World politics and Turkey
For the record, that was hardly surprising. The global system is headed in a direction, which requires NATO and the U.S. to strengthen their relations with Turkey. That’s why areas of cooperation – such as the administration of Kabul airport and Libya – had to take precedence over areas of disagreement. That is exactly what happened in Brussels. Those anticipating a Biden-Erdoğan fight would do their best to save their appetite for the U.S. president’s meeting with Russia’s Vladimir Putin. Biden’s attitude in Belgium seemed in line with Erdoğan’s call for a “new chapter” in Turkey-U.S. relations. The Turkish president made it abundantly clear that the bilateral meeting took place in a positive atmosphere: “We agreed to use dialogue channels effectively and regularly, as two allies and strategic partners ought to do. We had a most useful and sincere discussion. We see that there is a strong will to mark the beginning of an efficient period of cooperation, in all areas, on the basis of mutual respect and interests.” He added that there was “no problem in Turkey-U.S. relations that did not have a solution.”Erdoğan's other meetings
Erdoğan’s bilateral meetings with the leaders of Britain, France, Germany and Greece, too, concentrated on areas of cooperation. It was noteworthy that Erdoğan and French President Emmanuel Macron began speaking about working together in Libya and Syria. Furthermore, it must be taken into consideration that the final communique made references to the Syrian crisis and included a commitment to Turkey’s security measures. The Brussels summit will be remembered as an event that consolidated Turkey’s position within the Western alliance.The symbol of liberation
Erdoğan’s subsequent trip to Shusha, in turn, reflected the new realities of Turkish foreign policy. I was part of the official delegation that traveled to Azerbaijan this week to celebrate that country’s victory in Nagorno-Karabakh in its cultural capital of Shusha. That trip instantly became a symbol of the fraternal bonds and common destiny between Turkey and Azerbaijan. Indeed, Erdoğan absolutely deserved to join his counterpart, Ilham Aliyev, on that joyful day. The Turkish president made valuable contributions to the liberation of Shusha, after 27 years of Armenian occupation, just as he prevented the fall of Tripoli, making the establishment of the Libyan transition government possible. Turkey’s most recent diplomatic contacts in Tripoli, Brussels and Shusha reflect its new global and regional role. Moving forward, Ankara will concentrate even more on opportunities for cooperation in the Caucasus and Central Asia. That pursuit must be seen as an effort to promote stability and trade in the region – rather than a move against Russia or Iran. To conclude, Erdoğan continued to cement his country’s recent foreign policy moves with his meetings on the NATO summit's sidelines and his trip to Shusha.[Daily Sabah, June 17 2021]