Turkey is witnessing new versions of authoritarianism debates on its way to presidential elections.

President Obama's policies on these matters will have serious impacts on U.S. popularity in the world.

Turkey is faced with a public diplomacy problem which it has never faced before in all of its history: A diasporic opposition that is hierarchically organized and ruled from the USA.

How could the apathy of the international community towards the death verdicts in Egypt be interpreted? Is the decision for death sentences legitimate? Is the judiciary in Egypt independent?

In the years after the AKP came to power in November 2002, however, an active struggle against the military-bureaucratic grip on politics led to the eradication of the old regime and a gradual democratisation of the political system.

Is Assad really winning the war? And what does the victory look like for a regime that destroys its own country and has killed almost 200,000 people?

The biggest obstacle standing in front of the opposition to expand its constituency geographically is its unwillingness to break out of its comfort zone.

During the course of the demonstrations in Kiev, the Central Asian regimes once again tried to avoid possible fallout from these demonstrations by censoring the news about the events.

Since December 2013, there has been an increasing power struggle in Turkey between two former allies, the Gülen Movement and the ruling AK Party.

It is necessary to contemplate and understand why, in the face of such radical changes, Turkey's political map, party choices have remained the same.