Does Turkey have to Stand Idly against YPG Terrorism?

It is impossible for Turkey to stand idly by while YPG terrorists interfere in Idlib and threaten the security of the whole region

More
Does Turkey have to Stand Idly against YPG Terrorism
Trump's Miscalculations and Turkey's Future

Trump's Miscalculations and Turkey's Future

Needless to say, Trump was proven wrong. nor is there any reason to believe that his predictions will turn out to be true any time soon

More

For the Turks, it is Europe's failure to acknowledge and meet its responsibilities toward Turkey in a number of areas including the Syrian civil war.

The Brussels summit must be a milestone for NATO to determine a road map to truly fight against worldwide terrorism

Under the circumstances, it was no surprise that the NATO summit was not a complete disaster and instead an opportunity for the U.S. and the European Union to start talking about key issues.

Without NATO members' active involvement, it is impossible to reach a positive conclusion in the fight against global terror

Erdoğan, AK Party Seek to Strike Balance between Reform, 'Struggle'

The AK Party has taken sufficient courage from President Erdoğan's return, feeling more confident to renew itself with new reforms for the future of Turkey

More
Erdoğan AK Party Seek to Strike Balance between Reform 'Struggle'
U S Steals Role in Fight against Kurdish Terrorists

U.S. Steals Role in Fight against Kurdish Terrorists

How can the U.S. guarantee against possible aggression from the YPG to Turkey following the attack?

More

Turkey is a country that can continue its relations with European countries without the tutelage of the EU

This critical referendum aimed at fixing a system that has been generating significant crises for Turkey's governance.

As the regional actors were taking position according to their solution plan to the Syrian crisis, the U.S. attacked the regime's air base and messed up all the balances

President Erdoğan's Diyarbakır meeting played a big role in changing the way that Turkey's Kurds, who are indifferent toward the proposed changes, think about the April vote

The "red line" statement, the incoherence in statements and lack of action defined the U.S. policy toward the region. This policy of course caused a major challenge in Turkish-U.S. relations

With the April 16 constitutional referendum just three weeks away, both sides have fielded their heavyweights as part of a last-ditch effort to impress voters. The interference of European politicians and media outlets in the referendum in support of the "no" campaign completely politicized the process.

Today this dichotomy carries no meaning anymore on the current European political stage, neither for Europe's domestic politics nor in terms of its regard toward Turkey. Identity politics has prevailed over strategy in Europe

In a nutshell, the opposition's campaign rhetoric for the April referendum is a repetition of its obsessive anti-Erdoğan rhetoric, while those in favor of switching to the presidential system are able to clarify what the change will bring to Turkey

The first and most significant task of the Trump administration to revive the damaged Turkey-U.S. relations is to take steps to overcome the trust and confidence problems in bilateral relations

Turkey wanted to strengthen bilateral relations and increase trade volumes with Gulf nations against the backdrop of global chaos

In the Middle East, the Trump administration wants to defeat Daesh in the short run and then focus on containing Tehran's regional hegemony

There is a message for all in President Erdoğan's criticism of Chancellor Merkel's use of the phrase ‘Islamist terror,' as Muslims are the real victims of the terrorism

From the first conversation between the two leaders, both sides expressed a willingness to improve relations and re-strategize the partnership.